Impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic among health care workers in a secondary teaching hospital in Spain.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a huge challenge to healthcare systems and their personnel worldwide. The study of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers (HCW), through prevalence studies, will let us know viral expansion, individuals at most risk and the most exposed areas in healthcare organizations. The aim of this study is to gauge the impact of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in our hospital workforce and identify groups and areas at increased risk. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This is a cross-sectional and incidence study carried out on healthcare workers based on molecular and serological diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of the 3013 HCW invited to participate, 2439 (80.9%) were recruited, including 674 (22.4%) who had previously consulted at the Occupational Health Service (OHS) for confirmed exposure and/or presenting symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. A total of 411 (16.9%) and 264 (10.8%) healthcare workers were SARS-CoV-2 IgG and rRT-PCR positive, respectively. The cumulative prevalence considering all studies (IgG positive HCW and/or rRT-PCR positive detection) was 485 (19.9%). SARS-CoV-2 IgG-positive patients in whom the virus was not detected were 221 (9.1%); up to 151 of them (68.3%) did not report any compatible symptoms nor consult at the OHS for this reason. Men became more infected than women (25% vs 18.5%, p = 0.0009), including when data were also classified by age. COVID-19 cumulative prevalence among the HCW assigned to medical departments was higher (25.2%) than others, as well as among medical staff (25.4%) compared with other professional categories (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCW of our centre has been 19.9%. Doctors and medical services personnel have had the highest prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but many of them have not presented compatible symptoms. This emphasizes the performance of continuous surveillance methods of the most exposed health personnel and not only based on the appearance of symptoms.

Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Single-Center Study in Madrid, Spain.

BACKGROUND: There are scarce data about SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to analyze the incidence, clinical presentation, and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with IBD. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, observational study. We contacted all the patients being treated at our IBD unit to identify those patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, following the World Health Organization case definition. Data were obtained by patient electronical medical records and by phone interview. RESULTS: Eighty-two of 805 patients with IBD (10.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-12.5) were diagnosed as having confirmed (28 patients, 3.5%; 95% CI, 2.4-5.0) or suspected (54 patients, 6.7%) infection. Patient age was 46 ± 14 years, 44 patients were female (53.7%), 17.3% were smokers, 51.2% had Crohn disease (CD), and 39.0% had comorbidities. Digestive symptoms were reported in 41 patients (50.0%), with diarrhea as the most common (42.7%). One patient (1.2%) was diagnosed with IBD flare-up during SARS-CoV-2 infection. Twenty-two patients (26.8%) temporarily withdrew from their IBD treatment because of COVID-19. Most of the patients had mild disease (79.3%), and 1 patient died (1.2%). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of dyspnea was associated with moderate to severe infection (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.6-17.7; P = 0.01) and myalgias (odds ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.3-17.9; P = 0.02) were related to a milder clinical course. Immunosuppression was not related to severity. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with IBD is not rare. Dyspnea is associated with a more severe infection. Therapy for IBD, including immunomodulators and biologic therapy, is not related to a greater severity of COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 infections do not appear to be related to IBD flare-ups.

COVID-19 en pacientes españoles e inmigrantes en un área sanitaria de Madrid / COVID-19 in Spanish and immigrant patients in a sanitary district of Madrid

No disponible

Epidemiología y etiología de la candidiasis vaginal en mujeres españolas e inmigrantes en Fuenlabrada (Madrid) / Epidemiology and etiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis in Spanish and immigrants' women in Fuenlabrada (Madrid)

OBJETIVOS: La candidiasis vulvovaginal es una infección oportunista provocada por levaduras del género Candida. Los principales factores predisponentes son la gestación, los tratamientos con antibióticos y la diabetes mellitus. Candida albicans es la especie más frecuente, pero en países de África y Asia la frecuencia de Candida no C. albicans es más elevada. Hemos estudiado la distribución de las diferentes especies de Candida en mujeres españolas e inmigrantes. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los exudados vaginales recibidos en nuestro laboratorio durante los años 2015 a 2018. RESULTADOS: Se recibieron 2.283 estudios. Se detectó Candida spp. en el 25,7% en españolas y el 28,5% en extranjeras (la diferencia no es significativa). La tasa en inmigrantes es mayor que otras descritas en España. El 82,4% de los aislamientos correspondió a C. albicans. CONCLUSIONES: No hay diferencias significativas entre las tasas de los aislamientos de españolas versus extranjeras. Se observa una demanda proporcionalmente mayor de estudios en las mujeres inmigrantes

OBJECTIVES: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common vaginal infection. Risk factors include diabetes, antibiotic use and pregnancy. Candida albicans is the most common species identified but non-C. albicans species appear to be more commonly associated with VVC in some Asian and African countries. We had studied the distribution of Candida species in Spanish and immigrants' women residents in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of vaginal yeast cultures between 2015 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 2,283 vaginal yeast cultures were collected. Candida spp. was detected in 25.7% from Spanish women and in 28.5% from immigrants (no significant differences). Immigrants have higher rates of vaginal candidiasis compared other studies in Spain. C. albicans was the most common species isolated (82.4%). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in vaginal candidiasis rate between Spanish and immigrants' women. Immigrants consulted proportionally more compared with the Spanish women

Sensibilidad en enterobacterias uropatógenas productoras de BLEE versus no productoras, en pacientes pareados por edad, sexo y situación de ingreso hospitalario / Antimicrobial susceptibility in urinary tract infections caused by ESBL- and non-ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospitalized/outpatient-, sex-, age-matched patients

No disponible

Comparación de 2 pautas para detectar Streptococcus agalactiae usando medio Granada / Comparison of two pattern for Streptococcus agalactiae screening using Granada media

No disponible

Relevancia del aislamiento de Streptococcus agalactiae en urocultivos en la detección de gestantes colonizadas / The significance of identification of Streptococcus agalactiae in urine cultures for detection of Group B streptococcal colonization in pregnant women

No disponible